DeepSea wrote:Hmmm. Interesting. Wonder what the difference is? When I switched from OEM to the 115, I checked them both out real good side by side and they looked exactly the same, except for the color of the paper element. The rubber gromet had the same snug feel on the cover nipple.
Now, I'm going to have to get a 116 and compare the two. I did have one that had a loose fit and thought "odd". I just swaped out the gromet with the old one and all was good. Guess I need to check this out.
crfsonly wrote:i've researched the hi-flo and k&n both made by k&n and what i've been able to uncover is they MAY be made at the same plant this makes filters for various companies based on that company's specifications and design. as near as i can tell this is where the myth comes from. there are so many things that could be different from paper quality and filtration capabilities to construction materials and assembly techniques. i've always used the k&n and have had great success with them but it sounds like others are having a similar experience with hi-flo so i might as well offer an alternative paper filter. choice is a good thing...right? besides then we'll be able to follow up the "which radiator guard is the best" thread with a "which filter is the best".
ken
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
Copyright 2016-2017 © CRF's Only Forums.AllRightsReserved.