
paul turner wrote:450x![]()
BOSTON – In an epic upset in liberal Massachusetts, Republican Scott Brown rode a wave of voter anger to win the U.S. Senate seat held by the late Edward M. Kennedy for nearly half a century, leaving President Barack Obama's health care overhaul in doubt and marring the end of his first year in office.
bw wrote:Not that much of a victory, though, because Coakley's record as a Nifong-esque prosecutor meant anyone could beat her.
nminus1 wrote:bw wrote:Not that much of a victory, though, because Coakley's record as a Nifong-esque prosecutor meant anyone could beat her.
Huge victory though in reality because that liberal state has been a deadlock win for Ted for 50 years and the second he dies they elect a unknown republican....says alot about the mindframe of the dems and independents there......that being said, ANY senator/congressman regardless of his/her perceived stature would now have to think very carefully about their actions with house wide elections, many governor and senator up for re-election. Do they want to be associated with a very unpopular bill that either passes OR fails? Which would be worse...being associated with it passing or FAILING....
bw wrote:What I meant is it's not as much of a rebuke to Obama as people say it is. There were far left blogs saying hold your nose and vote for Brown because of Coakley's record.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
Copyright 2016-2017 © CRF's Only Forums.AllRightsReserved.