CRF's Only Forums

personally i think a mustang is way better but onestly out of top end speed a viper is better but if u soup a mustang its way encredibly faster in take off if the viper is still stock itll run 9 seconds throu the qaurter the mustang souped up will run 6 or 7 seconds!!!!!!!!!!!! reply please

A Mustang GT is 30k stock, Viper is 90k stock seems you could have one really bad GT and some coin left in your pocket. On the other hand if you have an extra 90k in your pocket GT Mustang's are a dime a dozen and the same can't be said about Viper's. The ultimate question is "How Big A Boy Are Ya"?

Take the money you would spend on a viper 90K, and put it into a new mustang, and you'll have one hell of a wild ride. Hell, for that much, you could transplant just about any engine you wanted into the mustang.

Money being no object the Viper blows away the Stang.

Having driven both, I'd purchase a Viper if the funds were available.

Mopar or no car!!!!!!

wow really? your comparing a modern car (mustang) to a high end sports car (viper).
that would like be comparing a Lamborghini to a Nissan altima. no comparison at all.

The Viper is a babe magnet! Wish I had one..