[Old Dude]

Gotta sell one of my other toys. My son drove it today for the first time and is almost as broken up about having to get rid of it as I am. If it has to go I'd like it to go to a good home. Check it out.
http://www.thecamarotrader.com/details.php?id=7552
S.O.D. (Sad Old Dude)

[woodsman]

That sux having to sell a nice car like that zippy 2.8 liter thing.

[Old Dude]

ZIPPY? Did you just say Zippy? Zippy my .......well anyway. That my young friend is as a Z28 spelled kick a$$ LS1 V8. Zippy; he just said Zippy
O.D.

[Asmith]

Zippy???

Is that even a word???

And what's with the 2.8 liter smack??? Is that some sort of Euro codeword???

[woodsman]

Z28=Zippy 2.8 liter. A anti chevy joke although I ALMOST wouldn't mind owning that thing.

[Old Dude]

The LS1 is 5.7 (348 cu in) about 310 claimed hp from the factory @ 5200 rpm and 340 ft/lbs of torque @ 4000 rpm. 0-60 mph in 5.5 sec. 13.8 1/4 mile @ 105mph The one for sale I would venture to guess tops these figures. (5.7 L=348ci : 2.8L= 171ci) Zippy, I got your zippy covered..... Zippy
L.O.D. (Laughing Old Dude)

[woodsman]

No chevy will ever beet the 1.9 0-60 set by a FORD Boss mustang. It was a V-8 10 liter and faster than hell.

[Old Dude]

Apples and oranges. You are right. That Mustang was brutally fast. For it time, probably the FASTEST. As I remember them, most muscle cars of that era were faster than those of today. But I got power windows and a CD player. Your Mustang had window cranks. (ask your Dad what a window crank is and ask him about the quality of that Pioneer 8 track while your at it
S.L.O.D. (Still Laughing Old Dude)

[Asmith]

No chevy will ever beet the 1.9 0-60 set by a FORD Boss mustang. It was a V-8 10 liter and faster than hell.

I think you mean 4.4 seconds...

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/cou ... index.html

[Asmith]

Alltime 0-60 record is 3.07 seconds.

http://www.dpccars.com/car-videos/10-10 ... Record.htm

[Old Dude]

....and 7 Liter V8. But that goes along with that 6 inch over estimation thing. This will help with your figures woodsman. http://www.sciencemadesimple.net/volume.php
Don't get me wrong, I agree with your statement about the Mustang but the figures ..... well that 6" thing again
L.H.O.D. (Laughing Harder Old Dude)

[woodsman]

I'm right. And for once you are wrong AS.
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Ford/1994/SVT_10.0L_Boss_Mustang/

You guys are thinking of a different 'Stang.

Lets see your camaro beet this.

[woodsman]

No chevy will ever beet the 1.9 0-60 set by a FORD Boss mustang. It was a V-8 10 liter and faster than hell.

I think you mean 4.4 seconds...

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/cou ... index.html

In another 1.1 seconds this 'Stang hits 100mph.

[BigD]

mmmm....beets.....

[Asmith]

I'm right. And for once you are wrong AS.
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Ford/1994/SVT_10.0L_Boss_Mustang/

You guys are thinking of a different 'Stang.

Lets see your camaro beet this.

Obviously a misprint on a forum. Check the records, then check reality...